Copenhagen’s Car-Free Streets & Slow-Speed Zones

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Copenhagen’s Car-Free Streets & Slow-Speed Zones

In Copenhagen, you never have to travel very far to see a beautiful public space or car-free street packed with people soaking up the day. In fact, since the early 1960s, 18 parking lots in the downtown area have been converted into public spaces for playing, meeting, and generally just doing things that human beings enjoy doing. If you're hungry, there are over 7,500 cafe seats in the city.

But as you walk and bike the city, you also quickly become aware of something else: Most Copenhagen's city streets have a speed limit of 30 to 40 km/h (19 to 25 mph). Even more impressive, there are blocks in some neighborhoods with limits as low as 15 km/h (9 mph) where cars must yield to residents. Still other areas are "shared spaces" where cars, bikes and pedestrians mix freely with no stress, usually thanks to traffic calming measures (speed bumps are popular), textured road surfaces and common sense.

We charmed you last month with our look at bicycling in Copenhagen, now sit back and watch livable streets experts Jan Gehl and Gil Penalosa share their observations about pedestrian life. You'll also hear Ida Auken, a member of Denmark's Parliament, and Niels Tørsløv, traffic director for the City of Copenhagen, talk about their enthusiasm for street reclamation and its effect on their city.

http://www.livablestreets.com/people/inwoodist inwoodist

A beautiful example of how civilized life can be in a well-designed urban environment.
Ian Turner

This was fun to watch. Thanks for sharing.
dunz

I am wondering why we couldn't make every 2nd avenue in the Inner Richmond in San Francisco a slow speed zone with room for kids & adults to play.
Moe

Good stuff - in fact, though Denmark seems quite a bit behind on slow speed areas compared to Germany, Austria, Netherlands and other places where 30k/hr is ubiquitous (outside the very slow 20/15k/hr zones). Most streets are 50k/hr, and the national police control speed limit policy.
http://michaelgr.com/ Michael G.R.

Awesome vid about an awesome city!
http://www.livablestreets.com/people/wklis W. K. Lis

Beware of micro-managing by city authorities. That includes zoning. Better to have mixed-use multi-level buildings, for examples, instead of zoning for only single use.
Andrew D. Smith

This blog's enthusiasm for slowing traffic has tilted into the absurd. Fast transportation is a benefit that makes life better. There are, of course, times when fast traffic is genuinely dangerous, and it's obviously appropriate to slow cars down in those cases. But much of the sentiment here is clearly about taking delight in slowing down those bastards who own cars.
Bob Davis

It's been a few years since I first saw the term "traffic calming". The concept seems to have originated in somewhere in Europe (Holland?) and has been adopted here and there in the US. My quibble is that the term could be considered a euphemism for "traffic restricting". "Calming" sounds more peaceful and less "authoritarian".
Louis P.

Mr. Smith that's a very inane comment. You actually admitt that speeds should be lower in some places because it is dangerous, which is exactly what this video exhales brilliantly. I didn't get where they said speeds in Copenhagen all need to be like 15 mph or something similar.
Sprague

It is important to note that traffic calmed streets are usually quieter streets (unless they are paved with cobblestones). They are safer and also more pleasant for everyone who lives within earshot.
Neil

Having just returned from Copenhagen, I can attest to their wonderful, pedestrian scale streets and squares. I would love to see what they're like in the winter though, and what affect, if any, the weather and daylight hours has on those streets.

It does make me wonder what SF could be like 40 or 50 years from now if their was the political will right now (especially for experiments like the Noe Valley square that seems stalled). What if Powell was closed to cars? Grant street thorough Chinatown seems a no brainer, but how about closing it all the way from Market into North Beach? SF especially seems well positioned to make these kind of changes, since we already have (for the US at least), a relatively good public transportation system, and pedestrian-scale streets.
Da Muse

I almost cried when I saw this. SF has so much potential, but the idiotic mayor and supervisors are too busy scoring points and maintaining status quo.

We have so many vacant plots. In the Castro alone there's this huge spot next to Swedish Hall which is lying vacant. Why can't these be converted to public spaces while the owners sit around?

People heavy streets like Castro, Valencia, 24th, etc. should have wider sidewalks so that outdoor cafes, restaurants, etc. can bloom.

SF potential is only matched by the supervisors' ineptitude.
alex

NEIL-

I was in Copenhagen last winter, and the streets are just as nice then as they are when the weather is warm. people do not linger at outdoor cafes when it is snowing or lounge on the cobblestones, but the city is still full of life as everyone is still biking and walking everywhere, waiting patiently for the sun to first emerge in the spring
Neil

Alex, thanks, that's good to hear. Hopefully I'll have a chance to visit in winter sometime.
FJ

@Andrew D. Smith.

Every situation is unique. Downtown Copenhagen has some very narrow streets that, when they were "regular" streets with some kind of side walk and two way traffic were highly dysfunctional for ANY purpose. Cars idling in traffic, people choking on exhaust and so on. The solution was, over the loud protests of the business community, to close down ONE street and make it a "foot traffic only". Waddaya know. Business boomed and soon the business community was screaming for an expansion of the "foot traffic area" to include some side streets and business boomed some more. The rest, as they say, is history. Apparently business thrive where people thrive. There's PLENTY of big streets and, as far as I remember, no less that 3 beltways.. so go ahead bring your car.

@neil
I have some pictures from downtown Copenhagen in December '05. The streets are PACKED. Only, nobody's wearing sandals
http://www.livablestreets.com/people/Eric Eric McClure

Awesome, Clarence!
http://www.bikefilmfestival.org Andy Salkeld

Am planning to screen this as header documentary at a 'Rec-cycling Cities' Q&A with Young Reporters from Leicester's Wave Magazine (All under 16) asking the questions of invited mayoral candidates (TBC).
We will screen a selection of other Streetfilm shorts & plug the idea of creating a Leicester 'Streetfilms' group as part of our http://www.citizenseye.org community media network. Keep up the great work !!
http://www.bikefilmfestival.org Andy Salkeld

Sorry forgot to add - the screening is part of Ride Leicester Film Festival - http://www.bikefilmfestival.org at 5pm on Saturday 28th August - Any Streetfilm fans in the UK will be welcome !
Glenn

What makes Copenhagen so amazing is that this was a conscious choice they made long ago to make their city more livable for everyday common person instead of yielding to the car. Copenhagen was just like most cities in the 1950s - making roads wider, building highways, narrowing sidewalks, even creating car-oriented suburbs. But then they said "Enough" and switched gears, retrofitting what existed and making public space people oriented. Any city can do what Copenhagen did and that's what makes it amazing!
Ed Pino

Another example of how Europe is so far in front of us in terms of Human functioning.
People first.
http://www.shareleaf.com Martin Tychsen

I live in Denmark - and have been in Copenhagen many times.

It sure is a wonderful city - just as my home town Odense.

Odense is announced to be Denmark's National Cycle City

You can read and see pictures from this maybe old article:
http://www.friefugle.dk/poland/odense_ta_en.html

Hope it is in your interest
Stu Butler

As a keen daily cyclist I was very proud to be one of the first to sign up for the London cycle scheme (£45 p.a.), along with 35,000 other Londoners in the first week!

There are over 6,000 bikes everywhere across London. With a electronic key you unlock a bike from a docking station and cycle anywhere within 30 minutes for free and then re-dock it.

The mini-video on Copenhagen must be the inspiration for 6K bikes to become 60K bikes by 2012 Olympics. To make Oxford St, Regents St, Bond St, Piccadilly, The Strand, The Mall, Soho all pedestrianized.

The most poignant comment in the video is "people want to be with people". Is London really to evolve to follow Copenhagen? For health, for community, for the environment, for the economy, for life.
Lars Barfred

@Moe

I live and bike in Copenhagen, and agree, 50k/h is the limit for almost all streets. Recently the City Council wanted to lower to 40K as the guiding principle for most streets. For some stupid reason the police both can and did refuse this.
In my mind larger streets should be 30 and residential streets should be 20. Copenhagen is not a big city, lowering speed limits will not seriously affect commuting time for anybody, what affects commuters is traffic congestion.
Any distance across the city of 10k or less is faster by bike, metro or s-train, than a car.

Really what is most annoying in danish traffic though is mopeds, 50 cubic motorbikes, they drive 30-50 km/h are allowed on the bike-lane, they think bikes should make way for them, because they are faster than most bicycles and pollute much more than cars, they should simply not be allowed
Wally

So jealous!!! Come on San Francisco!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jamie

I wonder if there were any adverse impacts on street usage as a result of the implementation of slower speeds, shared space or removal of parking spaces. It’s great to see that there were a lot of benefits as a result of these changes but it would be interesting if there was anything they would recommend doing differently to any other cities that are planning on taking this sustainable route.
http://ipbbe.blogspot.com/ Ulrich Jager

Without any doubt, Copenhague is an example of how all our cities should be. Cities were built for people and not for cars.
Norm Milstein

A video like this brings unashamed tears to my eyes. I watched the destruction of Los Angeles many years ago in the name of the automobile. By 1965 the pollution and traffic had reached absolutely obscene levels. I moved away in 1980, never to return.
It's time to resurrect our cities and make them great places for people to live and move about in. Copenhagen is one great example of what is needed. Thanks for this video.
Justin S

In North America, we created significant policy framework in the mid-20th century that supported expansion of automobile based urban development. Half a century later, the foundational inclusions within this policy framework remains and continues to make it extremely difficult for planners, engineers, and politicians to support even small changes to the urban environment that foster "liveable" streets as depicted in the film without exposing themselves (and ultimately tax payers) to legal/liability concerns - it's sad really.

Until we undergo serious efforts to strategicly deregulate or modify these technical standards and policies that hold strong, places like New York's revamped Time's Square will continue to be a rarity.

____Justin S
@urban_future
http://www.facebook.com/Andrew.Riesmeyer Andy Riesmeyer

I don't understand the elevation of New York's Time's Square in the video and like you said. People go there as a tourist destination. From a quality of life standpoint though, it's horrible. It's overcrowded and inefficient. People don't live in midtown, if you live on Manhattan you try to avoid TS at all costs. . It is basically a giant outdoor mall with big box retailers, scam camera shops and billboards the size of buildings.
Andrew, Batte-Kakembo

A fantastic example to learn from and follow where possible. In many countries people have a mentality linking good life to moving in cars missing out the benefits of exercising while walking and cycling let alone the resultant clean environment.
Robert

They're much more awake in San Francisco than most of the nation. That's more of a sorry statement about the rest of the US, but this is what is true for now.
Robert

It's much better than it was with all those cars in it, though. With those cars it was much, much worse. Now, it's much better that it was at that point in time. I should know- I used to live there.
Robert

This pair of sentences sums it up perfectly: There is a time and a place for cars. City streets have neither time nor space for cars (at least, not in the numbers or at the speeds they roam them today).
Robert

The opposite is also true. DOTs get sued no matter what they do.
Robert

What a shame. From what I gather, LA was a really lovely city with true character that was casually ruined by freeways, parking craters, parking garages and lots and overly wide streets built for cars only. Now they are just barely starting to reverse the damage they did. I hope they can fix it before time runs out for them.

Streetfilms