Park Slope: One Way Is The Wrong Way

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Park Slope: One Way Is The Wrong Way

Most advocates believe that two-way streets function better for pedestrians, cyclists, commerce, and livable streets. In fact all across the country, hundreds of cities are changing one-way streets back to two-way.

But in Park Slope, Brooklyn, the NYC Department of Transportation - without any community input or stated reason - has developed a plan to turn two-way 6th & 7th Avenues into one-way corridors for traffic like 8th Avenue. In this StreetFilm, advocates from each of the NYC Streets Renaissance partners show just how much 8th Avenue differs in its street geometry and car speeds and how it would impact neighborhood life on 6th and 7th Avenues.

Park Sloper

One would think that after viewing this video, the DOT should hang their heads in shame. Thank you for making everything so apparent.
George Motz

Great film. Unfortunately there's no mention of the number of high-speed accidents that have occured on 8th ave and Prospect Park West. Last summer I witnessed two separate vehicles out of control on both avenues that jumped sidewalks and plowed into buildings. You should get that speed gun out on PSW where I'm sure the speed are above 50mph.
1 Way HATER

I was at the meeting tonight just because your video pissed me off so much. Keep these things coming so we can finally make the DOT do the right thing.

Sign me,
One Way Hater
Phyllis Wrynn

A great job! What really needs to happen now is making the direct connection with the disastrous Atlantic Yards megadevelopment proposal. This very local issue, when seen in the broader context of powers shoving projects down our throats from without, and not giving residents a chance to have input about decisions that affect their neighborhoods, could encourage a much larger number of community residents to be natural allies in the fight against RATner.

How can we do this most effectively?
How can we help them to see the connection and begin to be a much more powerful force against the "three men in a room" decision that will destroy our incredibly special neighborhoods as we know them?

My husband feels that Park Slope, Clinton Hill, Fort Greene, Boerum Hill and Prospect Heights (and although not quite as PRECISELY relevant to the project, but certainly by extension, Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens, the Heights, etc.) should be a UNESCO site because this collection of great 19th and early 20th century beautifully built homes and factories is so unusual to have survived with the integrity it has, up to now.
Dan

Convincing arguement. I'm from Atlanta where traffic and walking is a nightmare. Good luck with your fight.
http://www.livablestreets.com/people/trorb/ Clarence

George (#3):

Actually we had Aaron talking about the speeds and numbers of accidents of late on 8th Avenue, but for the sake of keeping the video as short as possible (most people don't watch more than 5 minutes) we left them out...for now. If the powers that be do not make the right decision there are lots of plans to go forward with far more in-depth studies and more videos.
Pingback: StreetFilms » Victory!()
Pingback: Streetsblog » Primeggia’s One-Way Safety Claims Are Based on 1970s Studies()
http://www.camworld.com Cameron Barrett

I live on 18th Street near 6th Ave. Changing 6th and 7th Aves into one-way streets would be a disaster. Not only are there a large number of schools here there are also a lot of young families with moms and strollers walking around, numerous little parks and loads of pedestrian-friendly shops.

Changing 6th and 7th Aves into one-way streets would encourage the drivers of cars to go even faster in their never-ending quest to shave 10 seconds off their commute. Already we have too much truck traffic on 20th Street (heading to McDonald Ave or 4th Ave) and lots of traffic using 19th Street as a shortcut to Prospect Expressway because the 17th Street on-ramp is too congested between 4th and 5th Aves. Speaking of that they REALLY REALLY REALLY need to put a crosswalk light at that left on-ramp on 17th Street. Pedestrians have right of way when crossing over the on-ramp but you wouldn't know it by how many people I have see almost get hit. Just the otehr morning I saw a guy screaming at a delivery van that wasn't paying attention to pedestrians that almost hit him. The ironic part is there was a police car two cars back that DID NOTHING.

Lastly, they need to make U-turns on 5th Ave illegal. Too many times I have seen these lazy-ass drivers do a U-turn (or 3-point turn) in the street utilizing the bike lanes, blocking traffic in both directions -- just so they can save themselves the minute it would take them to go down to 4th Ave or up to 6th Ave and go around. A few weeks ago some idiot in a delivery van actually used the CROSSWALK on 5th Ave in front of Eagle Provisions to do a U-Turn, despite the fact I was IN THE CROSSWALK at the time. Completely illegal yet he did not care one bit that he almost hit me.

Bottom line is there are too many cars in Park Slope (and South Slope) and too many people who like to drive fast and aggressively. Allowing them to drive faster by making the Aves one-way is a recipe for disaster.
Contrarian

Sorry - I live near 8th Ave and while I agree that the speeding is a problem, the intersections there are certainly safer to cross than those on two-way 6th & 7th Aves. Brooklyn drivers are a menace - anyone in Park Slope knows you take your life in your hands trying to cross 7th Ave at 9th Street - and going one way would fix that by giving the CARS much less freedom of movement, something that should be applauded. Its a seperate issue from speed, which can be regulated by light timing. The real motvie behind the two-way veto is opposition to Atlantic Yards, and the loud, hypocritical, car-owning minority who would be inconvenienced in their sacred search for a parking spot. For bikers and pedestrians, as the statistics demonstrate, it would result in safer streets.
BBDB

Contrarian,

The One Way plan was a bad idea for numerous reasons having nothing to do with speeding or Atlantic Yards. Read this:

http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/04/06/primeggias-one-way-safety-claims-are-based-on-1970s-studies/
Pingback: Our Overabundance of One-Way Residential Streets « Columbusite()
Pingback: What Fell Street Could Look Like | Fix Fell Now!()
Pingback: Forward Lookout | Weekly Round Up()
Pingback: Streetfilms | Beyond #Sneckdown: Five Other Street Conditions You Can Observe or Document()

Streetfilms